Using the Flashlight Eye Test for Concussions: Does It Really Work?

Concussions remain one of the most common injuries in youth and professional sports, with up to 3.8 million incidents estimated each year in the U.S. alone. While public awareness and protocols around concussion have improved, objective diagnostic tools remain limited. Clinical assessments still rely heavily on self-reported symptoms, sideline checklists, and observational data. 

These limitations present challenges in fast-paced environments like sports medicine and outpatient rehab.

Recent advancements in dynamic pupillometry and smartphone-based technologies have brought renewed focus to the pupillary light reflex (PLR)—a fast, autonomic response that provides insight into brainstem and autonomic function. Emerging research now points to PLR metrics as reliable biomarkers for concussion, offering a quantifiable, physiologic measure to complement traditional concussion assessments.

Understanding the Pupillary Light Reflex in Concussion

The PLR describes the reflexive constriction and dilation of the pupils in response to light, driven by neural pathways involving the retina, midbrain, and autonomic nervous system. In healthy individuals, the reflex is rapid and symmetrical. In those with a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), subtle yet significant disruptions can occur. These include prolonged latency, reduced constriction velocity, and asymmetry—markers that may not be visible to the naked eye but are detectable through digital pupillometry.

Pupillary Light Reflex

Studies from Purdue University have demonstrated that individuals with mTBI exhibit both static and dynamic abnormalities in PLR, such as slower constriction speeds and smaller pupil diameters, indicating autonomic dysregulation and central nervous system involvement.

This aligns with broader findings from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, where researchers have linked visio-vestibular impairments—including abnormal eye movements and light sensitivity—to prolonged recovery from concussion.

Clinical Evidence Supporting PLR Metrics

A 2023 study published by the JAMA Network assessed PLR responses in adolescent athletes with diagnosed concussions and compared them to age-matched controls. Out of nine measured PLR parameters—including maximum and minimum pupil diameter, latency, constriction velocity, and redilation time—eight showed statistically significant differences between concussed and non-concussed individuals.

These findings provide a foundation for using PLR measurements as objective, quantifiable data points during sideline assessments and follow-up visits. Particularly notable is the delayed constriction response and prolonged redilation time—both indicators of slowed autonomic recovery post-injury.

In further support of this application, a peer-reviewed study in Life demonstrated the accuracy in measuring PLR metrics and detecting concussion-related changes. The app's ability to detect subtle alterations in pupil dynamics provides clinicians with an accessible tool for decision-making across diverse care settings.

Objective Concussion Assessments

Anytime, Anywhere

Sway’s FDA-cleared mobile app provides fast, reliable testing for athletic trainers and healthcare professionals.

Application in Clinical Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine

For physical therapists and clinicians working with concussion patients, the clinical relevance of PLR metrics is multifaceted. In the acute phase, they may assist in confirming neurologic dysfunction when symptom reporting is vague or underplayed. For example, athletes who minimize their symptoms to expedite return-to-play can still demonstrate abnormal PLR patterns, indicating unresolved neurophysiological stress.

In subacute or persistent cases, PLR assessment can help monitor recovery progress. If latency and constriction speed begin to normalize over time, this may support readiness to advance rehabilitation or reintegrate into academics and athletics. Conversely, persistent abnormalities suggest the need to extend recovery protocols or refer for more comprehensive neuro-optometric evaluation.

Consider the case of a high school soccer player two weeks post-concussion who reports continued visual fatigue and difficulty concentrating in class. Standard symptom checklists may show improvement, but a dynamic PLR test reveals lingering redilation delays and asymmetry. This objective data can reinforce the need for modified academic accommodations and delayed return-to-play, helping protect the athlete’s long-term neurological health.

Integrating PLR Assessment Into Multimodal Protocols

While promising, PLR testing should not be used in isolation. According to the 6th International Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport (Amsterdam, 2022), no single test is sufficient for diagnosis or return-to-play clearance. The most effective approach integrates multiple domains—symptom scales, cognitive and balance tests, oculomotor screening, and PLR measurements.

In clinical practice, visio-vestibular screening and PLR can complement one another. Visual dysfunctions, including convergence insufficiency and oculomotor instability, often correlate with pupillary irregularities. Persistent PLR anomalies may indicate autonomic imbalance or delayed central recovery, both of which are common in athletes with longer recovery timelines.

A review from Concussion Treatment Hub also highlights the frequency of persistent visual disturbances—such as photophobia, blurred vision, and eye strain—in post-concussive patients. These symptoms often stem from deficits in accommodation, saccades, and smooth pursuit movements—all systems that overlap functionally with PLR circuitry.

Benefits for Athletic Trainers and Sports Medicine Staff

For athletic trainers, PLR data offers both clinical and administrative advantages. In the field, it provides quick, non-invasive insight into neurophysiological function. In a busy high school setting, where resources are often limited, a smartphone-based PLR tool offers a practical way to document changes and track recovery across practices and games.

At the collegiate level, where care teams are larger and more specialized, athletic trainers can use PLR metrics to guide interdisciplinary conversations with physicians, neuropsychologists, and therapists. These objective markers also support clearer documentation for return-to-learn and return-to-play timelines—critical in environments with intense performance pressures and stakeholder scrutiny.

Additionally, having quantifiable data reduces the burden on athletic trainers when navigating parental concerns, coaching staff expectations, and institutional compliance. With research-backed technology in hand, clinicians can defend decisions grounded in both policy and physiology.

Considerations and Limitations

Despite its utility, PLR testing is not without limitations. Variability in ambient lighting, medication use (e.g., antihistamines or stimulants), and individual baseline physiology can all influence results. Establishing pre-season baseline data may help improve the interpretation of post-injury changes, especially in high-risk sports such as football, hockey, or soccer.

Moreover, additional studies are needed to map out recovery timelines using PLR and to correlate these measurements with long-term outcomes. As with any assessment tool, clinician training and consistent protocol execution are essential for reliability and reproducibility.

It’s also important to educate stakeholders that PLR is part of a broader strategy—not a stand-alone diagnostic solution. Used appropriately, it enhances clinical reasoning and patient care, but it should always be viewed in the context of the full clinical picture.

The pupillary light reflex is gaining recognition as a physiologic biomarker with real clinical value in concussion assessment. Supported by studies from leading institutions and validated through accessible tools like the Reflex app, PLR measurement provides clinicians with objective data to inform care from sideline to recovery.

For physical therapists, athletic trainers, and sports medicine professionals, integrating PLR into a multimodal assessment protocol offers a smarter, safer path toward personalized concussion care. It adds efficiency without compromising thoroughness, bridges clinical gaps, and empowers providers to make informed decisions backed by measurable outcomes.

In a field where clarity can be clouded by subjective reports and performance pressures, PLR offers something increasingly rare—objective visibility into the invisible injury.